Current Intros Options

[@Brian]

http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101354
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101356
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101375
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101376
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101379
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101383
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101391
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101417
http://www.di-rs.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=101421

Everyone take some time to read through them and if you think theres anything that needs highlighting or why theyre risky then post

[guggiey]

i agree with anthony with woonscapa.


gcliff has been rot 2 times i dont know the guy but this seems a little weird he wouldnt app a 3rd time.

plus he has spyed before on a clan
"Rot 2- Had fun in this rot, but ultimately decided to spy for 100fightmage. (I don't really remember why, I guess I thought Ag were the cool kids) I then got in to a situation with a rot member(gtow) in which he handed me about 150m+. I was young and got peer pressured by rot leaders to just take it and run, so I did.
Was a dick move and I regret it now. Haven't scammed since."



other then that i dont see no reason to give them a chance

[@Brian]

Is that lightinite guy still RoT? Its a big risk if he is. I remember people pointing it out to be before when she introed the first time.

[Fefe2]

not worth it at all

[@Brian]

would be good if everyone could read these by tomorrow and provide any feedback if theres any

[Amy]

Agreed on Woonscapa. Either intro ing to spy or to spite someone else, and either is not a good reason.

[Amy]

Agreed on Woonscapa. Either intro ing to spy or to spite someone else, and either is not a good reason.

[Geezer]

Woonscappa - Potential security risk but also a potential active member. She has history with a ROT member but the history isn't a good one. To my understanding of what she's told me in confidence is that she is more worried about what he'd do to her ala leaking the shit he has on her and quitting RS more so then spying on DI. I mean if she did spy it would be pretty evident but I doubt it, lightinite is too retarded to keep a spy quiet, She only joined because I recruited her, she didn't really express any intentions of joining and admitted that lightinite asked her to spy in the past. I genuinely don't have the attachment to this person that some people want to joke that I do, everything said is unbias, felt the need to calrify.

Gcliff - Been rot a few times but he was a brother to me in AG, haven't talked in a while but I don't see that relationship with him really changing. Me/SLeepgood recruited him hard, wasn't like he asked us to join not a likely spy.

The Ko people - They're all going to be great members, problem is similar to that with the Jeeps they join together, they'll leave together.

Don't know any of the others honestly.


This post has been edited by Geezer: Jul 31 2013, 01:01 AM

[guggiey]

Woonscappa - Potential security risk but also a potential active member. She has history with a ROT member but the history isn't a good one. To my understanding of what she's told me in confidence is that she is more worried about what he'd do to her ala leaking the shit he has on her and quitting RS more so then spying on DI. I mean if she did spy it would be pretty evident but I doubt it, lightinite is too retarded to keep a spy quiet,

Gcliff - Been rot a few times but he was a brother to me in AG, haven't talked in a while but I don't see that relationship with him really changing. Me/SLeepgood recruited him hard, wasn't like he asked us to join not a likely spy.

The Ko people - They're all going to be great members, problem is similar to that with the Jeeps they join together, they'll leave together.

i honestly would rather not have a active member like woonscappa if there is a sercurity risk. even 1% risk is to much tbh

This post has been edited by guggiey: Jul 31 2013, 01:02 AM

[Geezer]

Woonscappa - Potential security risk but also a potential active member. She has history with a ROT member but the history isn't a good one. To my understanding of what she's told me in confidence is that she is more worried about what he'd do to her ala leaking the shit he has on her and quitting RS more so then spying on DI. I mean if she did spy it would be pretty evident but I doubt it, lightinite is too retarded to keep a spy quiet,

Gcliff - Been rot a few times but he was a brother to me in AG, haven't talked in a while but I don't see that relationship with him really changing. Me/SLeepgood recruited him hard, wasn't like he asked us to join not a likely spy.

The Ko people - They're all going to be great members, problem is similar to that with the Jeeps they join together, they'll leave together.

i honestly would rather not have a active member like woonscappa if there is a sercurity risk. even 1% risk is to much tbh

If people deem the risk to be too great then that's one thing, but not everyone with some history or ties/affiliation to ROT is joining to spy.

Not going to lie to you guys I feel bad, I have no emotional attachment or any of the sort to this woman but me and Anthony convinced her to join, she left her other clan/team over it already, she legit started crying when I asked her to tell me all the shit that's happened in the past. I'm admittedly a gullible nice guy we all know this by now but I just honestly don't think she'd spy

This post has been edited by Geezer: Jul 31 2013, 01:11 AM

[Fefe2]

I think the ko members are fine, the other 2 could be very risky

[guggiey]

think we should just vote.

if people think she should be aloud to continue or if she shouldnt .

[guggiey]

No point really think geezer is the only one here that wants to give her a chance atm. The majority of us agree she might be to much of a security risk for us.

then lets end it and close her intro .

[Geezer]

Alright, and how does one earn our trust? By giving them a chance. Keep her as an intro for an extended period of time to prove her worth, she has access to very little.

This goes for more than just her, if we suspect someone as being sketchy make them earn our trust by giving em a prolonged intro process. Otherwise we're turning away potentially good members with no way of them really proving themselves.

This post has been edited by Geezer: Jul 31 2013, 02:36 AM

[guggiey]

Alright, and how does one earn our trust? By giving them a chance, keep her as an intro for an extended period of time to prove her worth, she has access to very little.

This goes for more than just her, if we suspect someone as being sketchy make them earn our trust by giving em a prolonged intro process. Otherwise we're turning away potentially good members with no way of them really proving themselves.

one person is not gonna make or break use we have 10 other intros we have to worry about.

plus we where pking today in p2p and she didnt wanna join use she just sat in castle .

This post has been edited by guggiey: Jul 31 2013, 02:37 AM